Which Is Best? Fematosecond Laser or Microkeratome Blade

LASIK is one of the most common laser eye surgeries. When people are tired of wearing contact lenses and eyeglasses, they often opt for LASIK. If you have decided to undergo LASIK, it's important to know that there are various types of laser surgeries and different instruments involved in the LASIK procedure.

One of the most debated topics among eye surgeons is the use of the microkeratome blade versus the fematosecond laser. Let’s compare these options to understand what both patients and doctors have to say.

First, let’s examine the discomfort level. Some doctors have found that patients prefer the microkeratome blade over the fematosecond laser because the fematosecond laser can cause discomfort and pressure during the procedure. When it comes to recovery time, both procedures are similar. However, patients have reported blurry vision for a week after using the fematosecond laser, which is less common with the microkeratome procedure. Some reports also suggest that visual accuracy is better with the fematosecond laser compared to the microkeratome.

The surgery time for the fematosecond laser is longer, and it is also more expensive compared to the microkeratome procedure. The fematosecond laser creates a cleaner and sharper flap and offers the option to create a thinner flap, which can lead to better post-surgical outcomes. Patients with epithelial basement membrane dystrophy are often advised to choose the fematosecond laser over the microkeratome blade.

Ultimately, choosing the best surgeon is crucial because the eye is a vital organ. The differences in the procedures often depend on the skill of the surgeon performing them. The treatment outcomes for both surgeries are generally similar, with only minor differences.

Blog Post Sponsored By AccuSpire.Com